Which strategy would NOT likely be a part of a systematic search for literature?

The strategy of using random keywords in a search engine would likely not be part of a systematic search for literature because systematic searches rely on structured and defined methodologies that ensure thoroughness and reproducibility. A systematic search involves precisely formulated research questions and the application of predefined keywords that are relevant to the specific topic of interest.

Setting inclusion and exclusion criteria is crucial as it helps define which studies will be considered based on specific characteristics, ensuring the relevance and quality of the selected literature. Utilizing multiple databases is another essential component, as it helps ensure a comprehensive coverage of the existing literature across various sources, therefore minimizing the risk of missing critical information. Documenting search strategies enhances transparency by allowing others to understand and replicate the search methods used, which is a key aspect of systematic reviews and evidence-informed practice.

In contrast, using random keywords lacks the rigor and planning needed to effectively capture relevant literature, making it an inadequate strategy for systematic searching.